Mild judgement for Guantanamo prisoner

The first military procedure against a Guantanamo prisoner is in the case of the Australian David Hicks, after obviously painful five years internment, pleases. It is mild and reads: Nine months detention.
The Australian of minister of foreign affairs Alexander Downer is that the 31-Jährige may serve its punishment in its homeland, that is sure like Christmas and Easter on one day.
A Verkürzung however does not give it definitely, because that would undermine the existing agreements over prisoner exchange. According to data of the USA Hicks is presumably transferred within two months into its homeland Australia.
The question of all questions is for me now: There one arrests five years long in the worst Knast, which one can introduce oneself, accuses it the terrorism and gives to him then nine months remaining sentence on the way. Did the man “employ” anything at all?
Terrorism stands generally for death penalty or for lebenslägnlicher detention, but 5 years U-detention and 9 months addition smells rather after judicial error, whereby the word law is not compatible with Guantanamo… at least not the word alone. With the word “even” before it already rather…
Over David Hicks I cannot form judgement, there the one-way Bereichterstattung so far too wischi waschi was… I look forward nevertheless to its distribution, perhaps already experience we times the truth…